Great question – no, I haven’t invented anything in scientific terms. Otherwise, every twist in research direction and techniques used or developed is a sort of invention
When I was working in Norwich I was working on a drug delivery system that would be targeting specific cells in the body. I built the framework of such a system, but unfortunately this never managed to make its way out of the lab.
I wouldn’t consider myself to be an inventor but my research has found a molecule that we don’t think has been seen before! It’s all very secretive at the moment though as we want to make sure it is what I think it is before we tell everyone!
I’ve not formally invented anything, however I have come up with terms that have not been used before. One of which is:
“Knowledge dependency”
This is something that you need to know in order to learn something else. It’s something we come across all the time in research – to keep stretching out to learn about something, you need to put a support in place.
We come across them all the time in chemistry teaching too: to fully understand ‘valence shells’, you need to know what an atomic orbital is. To fully understand atomic orbitals, you need to start considering quantum mechanics! Consequently, we teach you a bit of one topic, then we start teaching you a bit of the dependency, which allows us to further extend our original topic, and so on.
Teaching is rarely easy! And there is no one ‘correct’ order to teach things
Comments